DEALERSHIP AGREEMENTS

(ii) Model Forms
DEALERSHIP AGREEMENT BETWEEN A MANUFACTURING COMPANY AND FIRM
THIS AGREEMENT MADE ON THIS……………day of…………….BETWEEN
Chandika & Co. Ltd., a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956
and having its registered office at …………(hereinafter called the ‘company’ which
expression shall, unless the context admits otherwise, includes its
representatives) of the one part and Jumb & Jumboo, a partnership firm
consisting of Shri……………..,Shri……………………Shri……………….and Smt……………..w/o
Shri…………………partners, having its main business place at………………and branches
at………….. and ……………..(hereinafter called “the firm” which expression shall,
unless the context admits otherwise, include the partners, their heirs,
executors, administrators, representatives and assigns) of the other part..
WHEREAS
1. The company manufacturers cotton and
polyster fibre yarn suitings and shirtings.
2. The firm has its own well-established
marketing network and is selling goods of various manufactures and is desirous
of selling the goods of the company at a new sales depot recently taken by it
on rent for the purpose.
3. The company, after having considered the proposal
of the firm, has agreed to appoint the firm as its dealer on the terms and
conditions as hereinafter appearing.
NOW THIS AGREEMENT WITNESSES as under :
1. That the company hereby appoints the firm
as its dealer for selling its products, more particularly described in the
Schedule annexed hereto.
2. That the agreement shall remain in force
originally for three years commencing from…………but may be renewed for similar
periods on the terms and conditions as may be agreed by and between the parties
hereto.
3. That the firm shall keep a minimum stock
of…………pieces each of the company’s products described in the Schedule to meet
the demand of the ultimate users/consumers, and such quantity shall be reviewed
every quarter in the light of the sales during the previous quarter the
demands, consumers likings and the market trends.
4. That the company shall supply to the firm
its products on credit for fifteen days from the date of the invoice and shall
charge interest at the rate of………….per cent per annum from the sixteenth day of
the invoice till payment in full if payments are not made within the period
credit aforesaid.
5. That the company shall supply to the firm
publicity and advertisement material in sufficient quantity for display at the
firm’s sales depot and for the distribution in its area of operation.
6. That the company shall bear 60% of the cost
of maintaining the firm’s sales depot including rent thereof subject to a
maximum of 6% of the invoice value of all the products of the company sold to
the firm, which amounts shall be credited to the firm’s running account
maintained with the company at the end of each quarter.
7. That the accounts between the parties will
be settled half-yearly and the credit/debit balance shall be squared up by
making necessary payment6s by the parties.
8. The firm shall make all efforts for the
promotion of the sale of the company’s products and in the event of the company
being of opinion on the basis of sale records that the firm is failing in
properly performing its duty as dealer, the company shall be at liberty to
terminate this agreement by giving the firm one month’s notice in writing and
on the expiry of the notice period, this agreement shall stand terminated and
the parties shall settle their accounts within a week thereafter.
9. The company hereby agrees and undertakes to
supply to the firm its products as per the firm’s orders and on the company
failing to supply the goods under the firm’s orders ,the firm shall be at
liberty to terminate the agreement by giving the company one month’s notice in
writing and after the expiry of the notice period, this agreement shall stand
terminated and the parties shall settle their accounts within a week thereafter
10. The firm shall at no time sell any product
of the company at a price higher than that fixed by the company from time to
time
11. The firm shall be free and entitled to
appoint sub-dealers, salesmen, commission agents or other sales personnel on
salary, commission or any other basis, but with the condition that they will
function in accordance with the provisions of this agreement and not do
anything which is detrimental to the interest of the company, or the firm and
the collective interests of both.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, etc. SCHEDULE REPRRED TO ABOVE HIRE-PURCHASE AGREEMENTS
(I). Preliminary.- Hire-purchase agreements
have acquired special importance in the developing economy of the country. What
does hire-purchase agreement connote ? By a contract of hire-purchase is meant
a contract which in addition to terms of hire, provides that on payment of the
rent for a certain period, or for a certain number of times, or on the payment
of a certain sum after such payment of rent, or at some time during the hiring,
the property in the goods hired shall (or may) pass from the owner to the
hirer. [Periar’s Law of Hire and Hire-Purchase 2nd Ed., p.2]. In effect
hire-purchase agreement is a contract of bailment and is governed by the
provisions of Chapter IX of the India Contract Act, 1872. This agreement is
with an option to purchase though it is sometimes used in a wider sense to
include agreements where there is an irrevocable agreement to buy in
instalments are paid. A hire-purchase agreement thus creates a bailment, but is
a bailment plus an option to purchase. The transaction is composed of the
element of both the law of hire and sale, it would be clearly wrong to
assimilate it to a hypothecation of moveable property .[V. Dakshinamurthi
Mudaliar v. General & Credit Corporation (India) Ltd., AIR 1960 Mad. 328,
330].
The transaction partakes of a contract or
bailment with an element of sale added to it. In such an agreement, the owner
of the goods lest them on hire for periodic payments by the hirer upon an
agreement that when a certain number of payments by the hirer upon an agreement
that when a certain number of payments have been completed, the absolute
property in the goods will pass to the hirer, but so that the hirer may return
the goods at any time without any obligation to pay any balance of rent
accruing after return; until the conditions have been fulfilled, the property
remains with the owner. In this agreement the hirer is not bound to purchase
the thing hired, he has an option, he may or may not purchase.
But in either
case, if there an obligation to buy, or an option to buy, the goods delivered
to the hirer by the owners on the terms that the hirer on payment of a premium
as also of a number of instalments shall enjoy the use of the goods, which
ultimately may become his property, the transaction amounts to one of hire-purchaser,
even though the title to the goods has remained with the owner and shall not
pass to the hirer until certain event has happened, namely that all the
stipulated instalments have been paid, or that the hirer has exercised his
option to finalise the purchase on payment of a sum nominal or otherwise.
[Instalment Supply (P) Ltd. v. Union of India, AIR 1962 SC 53, 58: Sundaram
Finance Ltd. v. State of Kerala, AIR 1966 SC 1178].
(ii) Hire-Purchase agreement not sale.-It has
to be remembered that a hire-purchase agreement is not a sale even if it
contains a stipulation in the form of option of the hirer to purchase the
article hired. Even where the price for sale is to be pain in instalments
later, the property in the goods passes as soon as the sale is made. This
follows from the definition of sale in section 4 of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930
(as distinguished from an agreement to sell) which requires that the seller
transfers the property in the goods to the buyer for price.
The essence of sale
is that the property is transferred from the seller to the buyers for a price
whether paid at once or paid later in instalments. On the other hand , a
hire-purchase agreement as its very name implies, has two aspects. There is
first an aspect of bailment of the goods subjected to the hire-purchase
agreement, and there is next an element of sale which fructifies when the
option to purchase, which is usually a term of hire-purchase agreements, is
exercised by the intending purchaser.
Thus the intending purchaser is known as
the hirer so long as the option to purchase is not exercised, and the essence
of the hire-purchase agreement properly so called is that the property in the
goods does not pass at the time of the agreement but remains in the intending
seller, and only passes later when the option is exercised by the intending
purchaser. The distinguished feature of a typical hire-purchase agreement is
made but only passes when the option is finally exercised after complying with
all the terms of the agreement. [K.L. Johar & Co. vi Dy CTO, AIR 1955 SC
1082,1088].
The position of the owner of goods under a
hire-purchase agreement is that of a person who has made on irrevocable offer
to sell but no obligation to buy. [Helby v. Mathews, (1895) AC 471 ; Lee v.
Butler, (1893) 2 Q.B. 318]. T essence of the hire-purchase agreement is that
the hirer is not bound to purchase . [Dalpat Rai v. Manohar Lal & Sons, AIR
1974 Raj. 61]. A hire-purchase agreement has two elements ; (I) element of
bailment, and (ii) element of sale, in the sense that it contemplates an
eventual sale. The element of sale fructifies when the option is exercised by
the intending purchaser after fulfilling the terms of the agreement. When all
the terms of the agreement are satisfied and the option to purchase is
exercised, a sale takes place of the goods which till then had been hired.
[K.L.Johar & Co. v. Dy. CTO, AIR 1965 SC 1082, 1090].
(iii) Duty of hirer.-According to section 151
of the Contract Act, 1872, the hirer is bound to take as much care of the goods
hired to him as a man of ordinary prudence would under similar circumstances
take of his own goods of the same bulk, quality and value as the goods hired.
Under Section 152 of the Contract Act, the hirer in the absence of any special
contract is not responsible for the loss, destruction or deterioration of the
thing hired, if he has taken such care. Accordingly, the parties may provide by
stipulation in that behalf that the hirer will be liable for any loss or damage
to the goods arising from any cause whatever.
(iv) Parties .-Normally , there are two
parties to the hire-purchase agreement, viz., the owner and the hirer. However,
sometimes a financier, for example in case of motor vehicles, is also brought
in as a necessary party who purchase the vehicle from the owner and lets the
same on hire to the hirer on instalments and in such case, a guarantor is also
required to be supplied by the hirer to secure fulfilment of the obligations
imposed on the hirer under the agreement.
(v).- Clauses.-In drafting a hire-purchase
agreement, care should be taken to draft the following important clause in the
agreement properly ;
(a) No obligation to buy.-The agreement of
hire-purchase should not amount to an agreement to buy but it should only give
the hirer an option to purchase because where a person under an agreement to
buy obtains the possession of the goods and the hirer under the hire-purchase
agreement so obtains the possession, he would be able to give little to any one
who takes the goods on sale or pledge from him without notice of the hire
purchase agreement [See section 30 (2) of the Sales of Goods Act, 1930 and
thereby the hirer would be able to defeat the intention of the owner. Where,
however, the agreement is not an agreement to buy but it merely give an option
to the hirer to buy on the fulfillment of certain conditions, the hirer cannot
gives a valid title to any one. [Roopchand Jankidas v. National Bank, 46 Cal.
342].
(b) Property in goods not to pass.-A
hire-purchase agreement must contain an express stipulation that the property
in the goods shall not pass of the hirer untill all instalments have been paid.
Minimum payment clause.-A hire-purchase
agreement may be terminated either by the owner or hirer and the hirer may
return the article to the owner after terminating the agreement. But since the
articles are subject to usual wear and tear on account of user, it is usual to
insert a “minimum payment” clause in the agreement in order to provide for
depreciation of the article taken under the hire-purchase agreement. Such a
clause provides that in the event of the agreement being determined by the
owner or the hirer, the hirer shall be liable to pay 50% of the total price
after deduction of the instalments already paid by the hirer.
(d) Seizure clause.-It is also usual to
incorporate a clause in the hire-purchase agreement empowering the owner to
seize the article hired in the event of the hirer committing a breach of any
terms thereof, particularly the non-payment of monthly hire.
(vi) Claim of financier to prevail over the
state.-Where under a hire-purchase agreement, the financier, i.e., the owner
lets on hire a motor vehicle to the hirer, clause 4 of the agreement states
that, on default by the hirer, the owner can seize, remove and retake possession
of the vehicle and sue for all the instalments due and for damage for breach of
the agreement and for all the costs of retaking of possession of the said
vehicle and all costs occasioned by the hirer’s default. Clause 6 would show
that, only upon the hirer paying the entire amounts due under the agreement,
the said vehicle shall become the sole and absolute property of the hirer.
In
regard to the registration of the vehicle shall become the sole and absolute
property of the hirer. In regard to the registration of the vehicle, thought it
is in hirer’s name, clause 8 of the agreement states that the owners-meaning
the financing company agree to permit the hirer to have the registration of the
vehicle in his name provided that the hirer shall transfer the registration in
the name of the owners whenever required to do so by them and especially when
the hirer commits breach of any of the conditions of the agreement.
In the
light of these clauses in the agreement and in the event of the financier
seizing the vehicle on default on the hirer in payment of the instalments, the
claims of the financier would prevail over that of the State. Where a person
has got a prior secured right over the property, the State’s claim will not
prevail. In the Income-tax Act, there is no substantive provision for
superseding or overriding the claims or rights of a secured creditor. Schedule
II mentioned in section 222 of the I.T. Act, 1961, which contains statutory
rules in accordance with which the modes of recovery mentioned in that section
have to be exercised, relates to procedure only and does not deal with
substantive rights. [Sundaram Finance Ltd. v. RTO, (1979) 117 ITR 334 (Ker)].
(vii) Allowability of depreciation of hired
article.-The Board has issued the following circular containing instructions
regarding depreciation allowance on plant and machinery acquired under
hire-purchase agreement.
“The following instructions are issued for
dealing with case in which as asset is being acquired under or on what is known
as hire-purchase agreement:-
(i) In every case of payment purporting to be
for hire-purchase, production of the agreement under which the payment is made
should be insisted on.
(ii) Where the effect of an agreement is that
the ownership of the subject is at once transferred to the lessee( e.g. where
the lessor obtains a right to sue for arrear of instalments but no right to
recovery of the asset) the transaction should be regarded as one of purchase by
instalments and no deduction in respect of “hire” should be made. Depreciation
should be allowed to the lessee on the entire purchase price as per the
agreement.
(iii) Where the terms of the agreement provide
that the equipment shall eventually become the property of the hirer or confer
on the hirer an option to purchase the equipment, the transaction should be
regarded as one of hire-purchase. In such case the periodical payments made by
the hirer should not tax purposes be regarded as made up of-
(a) consideration for hire, to be allowed as a
deduction in the assessment ; and
(b) payment on account of purchase, to be treated as capital outlay, depreciation being allowed to the lessee on the initial value(i.e., the amount for which the hired subject would have been sold for cash at the date of the agreement).”
(b) payment on account of purchase, to be treated as capital outlay, depreciation being allowed to the lessee on the initial value(i.e., the amount for which the hired subject would have been sold for cash at the date of the agreement).”
The allowance to be made in respect of hire
should be the difference between the aggregate amount of the periodical
payments under the agreement and the initial value(as described above), the
amount of this allowance being spread evenly over the term of agreement. If, however,
the agreement was terminated either by outright purchase of the equipment or
its return to the owner, the deduction should cease as from the date of the
termination.
An assessee claiming this deduction should be
asked to furnish a certificate from the vendor or other satisfactory evidence
of the initial value (as described above). Where no certificate or satisfactory
evidence is forthcoming, the initial value should be arrived at by computing
the present value of the amount payable under the agreement at an appropriate
rate per centum. In doubtful case the fact should be reported to the Board”.
[Circular No.9 of 1943, R. Dis. No. 27(4) IT/43, dated 23rd March, 1943].
(viii) Registration.-Registration of a
hire-purchase agreement is not compulsory.
(ix) Stamp duty.-The hire-purchase agreement
requires a stamp of only Re. 1 like an ordinary agreement.
(x) Model Forms
DISCLAIMER: THE ARTICLE IS BASED ON THE RELEVANT
PROVISIONS AND AS PER THE INFORMATION EXISTING AT THE TIME OF THE PREPARATION.
IN NO EVENT I SHALL BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT AND INDIRECT RESULT FROM THIS
ARTICLE. THIS IS ONLY A KNOWLEDGE SHARING INITIATIVE.
THE AUTHOR – CS
DEEPAK SETH (ASSOCIATE PARTNER HELPINGHANDS PROFESSIONALS LLP) AND CAN
BE REACHED AT CONTACTHHPRO@GMAIL.COM OR 9910248911.
0 Comments