Auditor to Sign Audit
Reports, etc.

COMMENT:
(1) A
person shall be eligible for appointment as an auditor of a company only if he
is a chartered accountant:
Provided that a firm
whereof majority of partners practising in India are qualified for appointment
as aforesaid may be appointed by its firm name to be auditor of a company.
(2) Where a firm
including a limited liability partnership is appointed as an auditor of a company,
only the partners who are chartered accountants shall be authorised to act and
sign on behalf of the firm.
(3) The following
persons shall not be eligible for appointment as an auditor of a company,
namely:—
(a) a body corporate
other than a limited liability partnership registered under the Limited
Liability Partnership Act, 2008;
(b) an officer or
employee of the company;
(c) a person who is
a partner, or who is in the employment, of an officer or employee of the
company;
(d) a person who, or
his relative or partner—
(i) is holding any
security of or interest in the company or its subsidiary, or of its holding or
associate company or a subsidiary of such holding company:
Provided that the
relative may hold security or interest in the company of face value not
exceeding one thousand rupees or such sum as may be prescribed;
(ii) is indebted to
the company, or its subsidiary, or its holding or associate company or a
subsidiary of such holding company, in excess of such amount as may be prescribed;
or
(iii) has given a
guarantee or provided any security in connection with the indebtedness of any
third person to the company, or its subsidiary, or its holding or associate
company or a subsidiary of such holding company, for such amount as may be prescribed;
(e) a person or a
firm who, whether directly or indirectly, has business relationship with the
company, or its subsidiary, or its holding or associate company or subsidiary
of such holding company or associate company of such nature as may be prescribed;
(f) a person whose
relative is a director or is in the employment of the company as a director or
key managerial personnel;
(g) a person who
is in full time employment elsewhere or a person or a partner of a firm holding
appointment as its auditor, if such persons or partner is at the date of such
appointment or reappointment holding appointment as auditor of more than twenty
companies
(h) a person who has
been convicted by a court of an offence involving fraud and a period of ten
years has not elapsed from the date of such conviction;
(i) 2[a person who,
directly or indirectly, renders any service referred to in section 144 to the
company or its holding company or its subsidiary company.
Explanation—For the
purposes of this clause, the term "directly or indirectly" shall have
the meaning assigned to it in the Explanation to section 144.]
(4) Where a person
appointed as an auditor of a company incurs any of the disqualifications
mentioned in sub-section (3) after his appointment, he shall vacate his office
as such auditor and such vacation shall be deemed to be a casual vacancy in the
office of the auditor.
Auditors to Attend General Meeting
COMMENT: All notices of, and other communications
relating to, any general meeting shall be forwarded to the auditor of the
company, and the auditor shall, unless otherwise exempted by the company,
attend either by himself or through his authorised representative, who shall
also be qualified to be an auditor, any general meeting and shall have right to
be heard at such meeting on any part of the business which concerns him as the
auditor.
COMMENT: (1) If any of the provisions of sections 139 to 146 (both inclusive) is contravened, the
company shall be punishable with fine which shall not be less than twenty-five
thousand rupees but which may extend to five lakh rupees and every officer of
the company who is in default shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term
which may extend to one year or with fine which shall not be less than ten
thousand rupees but which may extend to one lakh rupees, or with both.
(2) If an auditor of a company contravenes any of the provisions of section 139, section 143, section 144 or section 145, the auditor shall be punishable with fine which shall not be less than twenty-five thousand rupees but which may extend to five lakh rupees 1[or four times the remuneration of the auditor, whichever is less]
(2) If an auditor of a company contravenes any of the provisions of section 139, section 143, section 144 or section 145, the auditor shall be punishable with fine which shall not be less than twenty-five thousand rupees but which may extend to five lakh rupees 1[or four times the remuneration of the auditor, whichever is less]
Provided that if an auditor has
contravened such provisions knowingly or wilfully with the intention to deceive
the company or its shareholders or creditors or tax authorities, he shall be
punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to one year and 2[with
fine which shall not be less than fifty thousand rupees but which may extend to
twenty-five lakh rupees or eight times the remuneration of the auditor,
whichever is less]
(3) Where an auditor has been
convicted under sub-section (2), he shall be liable to—
(i) refund the remuneration received by him to the company; and
(ii) pay for damages to the company, statutory bodies or authorities 3[or to members or creditors of the company] for loss arising out of incorrect or misleading statements of particulars made in his audit report.
(i) refund the remuneration received by him to the company; and
(ii) pay for damages to the company, statutory bodies or authorities 3[or to members or creditors of the company] for loss arising out of incorrect or misleading statements of particulars made in his audit report.
(4) The Central Government shall, by
notification, specify any statutory body or authority or an officer for
ensuring prompt payment of damages to the company or the persons under clause
(ii) of sub-section (3) and such body, authority or officer shall after payment
of damages to such company or persons file a report with the Central Government
in respect of making such damages in such manner as may be specified in the
said notification.
(5) Where, in case of audit of a
company being conducted by an audit firm, it is proved that the partner or
partners of the audit firm has or have acted in a fraudulent manner or abetted
or colluded in any fraud by, or in relation to or by, the company or its
directors or officers, the liability, whether civil or criminal as provided in
this Act or in any other law for the time being in force, for such act shall be
of the partner or partners concerned of the audit
firm and of the firm jointly and severally
Provided that
in case of criminal liability of an audit firm, in respect of liability other
than fine, the concerned partner or partners, who acted in a fraudulent manner
or abetted or, as the case may be, colluded in any fraud shall only be
liable.
DISCLAIMER: THE
ARTICLE IS BASED ON THE RELEVANT PROVISIONS AND AS PER THE INFORMATION EXISTING
AT THE TIME OF THE PREPARATION. IN NO EVENT I SHALL BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT
AND INDIRECT RESULT FROM THIS ARTICLE. THIS IS ONLY A KNOWLEDGE SHARING
INITIATIVE.
THE AUTHOR
– CS DEEPAK SETH (ASSOCIATE PARTNER HELPINGHANDS PROFESSIONALS LLP) AND
CAN BE REACHED AT CONTACTHHPRO@GMAIL.COM OR 9910248911.
0 Comments