Central Government to Specify
Audit of Items of Cost in Respect of Certain Companies

COMMENT: Applicability for Cost Audit:-
(1) Every company specified in item (A) of rule 3 shall
get its cost records audited in accordance with these rules if the overall
annual turnover of the company from all its products and services during the
immediately preceding financial year is rupees fifty crore or more and the
aggregate turnover of the individual product or products or services for which
cost records are required to be maintained under rule 3 is
rupees twenty five crore or more.
(2) Every company specified in item (B) of rule 3 shall
get its cost records audited in accordance with these rules if the overall
annual turnover of the company from all its products and services during the
immediately preceding financial year is rupees one hundred crore or more and
the aggregate turnover of the individual product or products or service or
services for which cost records are required to be maintained under rule 3 is
rupees thirty five crore or more.
(3) The requirement for cost audit
under these rules shall not apply to a company which is covered in rule 3, and-
(i) whose revenue from exports, in
foreign exchange, exceeds seventy five per cent of its total revenue; or
(ii) Which is operating from a
special economic Zone.”]
(iii) which is engaged in
generation of electricity for captive consumption through Captive Generating
PIant. For this purpose, the term "Captive Generating Plant" shall
have the same meaning as assigned in rule 3 of the Electricity Rules,
2005
Provided that the Central Government
shall, before issuing such order in respect of any class of companies regulated
under a special Act, consult the regulatory body constituted or established
under such special Act.
(2) If the Central Government is of
the opinion, that it is necessary to do so, it may, by order, direct that the
audit of cost records of class of companies, which are covered under
sub-section (1) and which have a net worth of such amount as may
be prescribed or a turnover of such
amount as may
be prescribed, shall be conducted in the manner
specified in the order.
(3) The audit under sub-section (2)
shall be conducted by a 1[Cost
Accountant] who shall be appointed by the Board on such
remuneration as may be determined by the members in such manner as may
be prescribed:
Provided that no person appointed
under section
139 as an auditor of the company shall be appointed for
conducting the audit of cost records:
Provided further that the auditor
conducting the cost audit shall comply with the cost auditing standards.
Explanation.—For the purposes of this
sub-section, the expression “cost auditing standards” mean such standards as
are issued by the 2[Institute
of Cost Accountants of India], constituted under the Cost and
Works Accountants Act, 1959, with the approval of the Central Government.
COMMENT: Remuneration of the Cost Auditor.
(a) in the case of companies which are required to
constitute an audit committee-
(i) the Board shall appoint an individual, 1[who is
a cost accountant], or a firm of cost accountants in practice, as cost
auditor on the recommendations of the Audit committee, which shall also
recommend remuneration for such cost auditor;
(ii) the remuneration recommended by the Audit Committee
under (i) shall be considered and approved by the Board of Directors and
ratified subsequently by the shareholders;
(b) in the case of other companies which are not required
to constitute an audit committee, the Board shall appoint an individual 1[who
is a cost accountant] or a firm of cost accountants
in practice as cost auditor and the remuneration of such cost auditor shall be
ratified by shareholders subsequently.
(4) An audit conducted under this
section shall be in addition to the audit conducted under section
143.
(5) The qualifications,
disqualifications, rights, duties and obligations applicable to auditors under
this Chapter shall, so far as may be applicable, apply to a cost auditor
appointed under this section and it shall be the duty of the company to give
all assistance and facilities to the cost auditor appointed under this section
for auditing the cost records of the company:
COMMENT: Report on the audit
of cost records shall be submitted by the [cost
accountant] to the Board of Directors of the company.
(6) A company shall within thirty
days from the date of receipt of a copy of the cost audit report prepared in
pursuance of a direction under sub-section (2) furnish the Central Government
with such report along with full information and explanation on every
reservation or qualification contained therein.
(7) If, after considering the cost
audit report referred to under this section and the information and explanation
furnished by the company under sub-section (6), the Central Government is of
the opinion that any further information or explanation is necessary, it may
call for such further information and explanation and the company shall furnish
the same within such time as may be specified by that Government.
(8) If any default is made in
complying with the provisions of this section,—
(a) the company and every officer of the company who is in default shall be punishable in the manner as provided in sub-section (1) of section 147;
(a) the company and every officer of the company who is in default shall be punishable in the manner as provided in sub-section (1) of section 147;
(b) the cost auditor of the company
who is in default shall be punishable in the manner as provided in sub-sections
(2) to (4) of section
147.
COMMENT: Punishment for
Contravention
(1) If any of the provisions
of sections 139 to 146 (both inclusive) is contravened, the company shall be
punishable with fine which shall not be less than twenty-five thousand rupees but
which may extend to five lakh rupees and every officer of the company who is in
default shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to
one year or with fine which shall not be less than ten thousand rupees but
which may extend to one lakh rupees, or with both.
(2) If an auditor of a company
contravenes any of the provisions of section 139, section 143, section 144 or
section 145, the auditor shall be punishable with fine which shall not be less
than twenty-five thousand rupees but which may extend to five lakh rupees 1[or
four times the remuneration of the auditor, whichever is less]
Provided that if an auditor has
contravened such provisions knowingly or wilfully with the intention to deceive
the company or its shareholders or creditors or tax authorities, he shall be
punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to one year and 2[with
fine which shall not be less than fifty thousand rupees but which may extend to
twenty-five lakh rupees or eight times the remuneration of the auditor,
whichever is less
(3) Where an auditor has been
convicted under sub-section (2), he shall be liable to—
(i) refund the remuneration
received by him to the company; and
(ii) pay for damages to the
company, statutory bodies or authorities 3[or to members or creditors of the
company] for loss arising out of incorrect or misleading statements of
particulars made in his audit report.
(4) The Central Government shall,
by notification, specify any statutory body or authority or an officer for
ensuring prompt payment of damages to the company or the persons under clause
(ii) of sub-section (3) and such body, authority or officer shall after payment
of damages to such company or persons file a report with the Central Government
in respect of making such damages in such manner as may be specified in the
said notification.
(5) Where, in case of audit of a
company being conducted by an audit firm, it is proved that the partner or partners
of the audit firm has or have acted in a fraudulent manner or abetted or
colluded in any fraud by, or in relation to or by, the company or its directors
or officers, the liability, whether civil or criminal as provided in this Act
or in any other law for the time being in force, for such act shall be of the
partner or partners concerned of the audit firm and of the firm jointly and
severally
COMMENT: In case of
criminal liability of an audit firm, in respect of liability other than fine, the
concerned partner or partners, who acted in a fraudulent manner or abetted or,
as the case may be, colluded in any fraud shall only be liable.
DISCLAIMER: THE
ARTICLE IS BASED ON THE RELEVANT PROVISIONS AND AS PER THE INFORMATION EXISTING
AT THE TIME OF THE PREPARATION. IN NO EVENT I SHALL BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT
AND INDIRECT RESULT FROM THIS ARTICLE. THIS IS ONLY A KNOWLEDGE SHARING
INITIATIVE.
THE AUTHOR
– CS DEEPAK SETH (ASSOCIATE PARTNER HELPINGHANDS PROFESSIONALS LLP) AND
CAN BE REACHED AT CONTACTHHPRO@GMAIL.COM OR 9910248911.
0 Comments